LandSpace moves China’s space sector closer to the SpaceX model

• LandSpace’s failed rocket test points to a SpaceX-style shift in China’s space industry.
• Public failure aligns it with a SpaceX-style engineering model.

For years, China’s space programme optimised for certainty. Launches were designed to succeed the first time, failures were rare, and experimentation stayed largely behind closed doors. That operating model is now under strain.

A new generation of private launch firms is testing whether China can afford to be more open about risk. Among them, LandSpace has become the most visible example—not because it succeeded, but because it failed in public.

Earlier this month, the Beijing-based startup attempted China’s first reusable rocket recovery. The test did not end in a controlled landing. Instead of being buried, the outcome was reported by state media and discussed openly by engineers. That alone marked a departure from past practice.

Failure as a design input

At the centre of LandSpace’s approach is a different view of how progress happens.

“(SpaceX) can push products to the edge and even into failure, quickly identifying limits and iterating,” Zhuque-3 chief designer Dai Zheng told state broadcaster CCTV after the rocket’s inaugural flight.

That philosophy shaped Dai’s career move nearly a decade ago. In 2016, he left the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology, the country’s main state-owned rocket developer, to join LandSpace. Reusability—and the willingness to accept early failure—was the draw.

China’s state-led space programme has historically treated failed launches as reputational risks. SpaceX, by contrast, turned visible failure into part of its development loop. LandSpace is attempting to import that logic into a system that was not built for it.

Signs of that shift are starting to appear beyond a single company. Earlier this month, state media covered two failed recovery attempts involving reusable rockets, one of which was carried out by a state-owned firm just weeks after Zhuque-3’s test.

Reverse engineering a cost model

The technical inspiration behind LandSpace is well known. The company is working towards a reusable rocket that lowers launch costs in a way similar to SpaceX’s Falcon 9. That goal matters as China plans to deploy satellite constellations on a scale not seen before.

“Falcon 9 is a successful configuration that has been tested by engineering,” Zhuque-3 deputy chief designer Dong Kai said in a podcast interview last week. “After studying it, we recognise its rationality; this is learning, not imitation.”

“Calling (Zhuque-3) a ‘Chinese Falcon 9,’ I think, is a very high compliment.”

Design choices such as stainless steel structures and methalox engines—powered by methane and liquid oxygen—reflect that thinking. These features are not cosmetic—they are attempts to reduce manufacturing and operational costs in a sector where margins are thin and launch cadence matters.

Still, the biggest savings come from one capability alone: recovering and reusing the first stage. That is also where most attempts fail.

Money determines tolerance for risk

Technical ambition is only part of the equation. The other is capital and Dai has been blunt about the limits LandSpace faces compared with its US counterpart. SpaceX’s ability to absorb repeated failures during Starship testing rests on deep financial backing.

“For us, we’re not yet able to do that,” Dai told CCTV.

“I believe our country has recognised this, allowing capital markets to support companies (in areas) like commercial space flight.”

China opened its space sector to private investment in 2014, which led to the formation of several launch startups. More recently, policymakers have moved to make it easier for leading firms to pursue public listings. LandSpace is now preparing to go public as it looks to fund its next phase of development.

The message from Beijing appears to be shifting: if private firms are expected to experiment, they will need access to capital that can tolerate losses

Being watched from the outside

LandSpace’s work has not gone unnoticed beyond China.

A month before Zhuque-3’s test, SpaceX founder Elon Musk commented on a video showing the rocket’s assembly, noting how its design blended ideas from Falcon 9 and Starship.

“They have added aspects of Starship, such as use of stainless steel and methalox, to a Falcon 9 architecture, which would enable it to beat Falcon 9,” Musk said in October, in his first public comments about LandSpace. “But Starship is in another league.”

The comment captured the competitive reality. Borrowing proven ideas can shorten development time, but it does not erase the gap created by years of flight data, capital, and operational experience.

An unfinished transition

LandSpace is now preparing another launch attempt after its December failure, when Zhuque-3’s booster failed to ignite its landing burn around three kilometres above the ground and crashed instead of landing under control.

SpaceX faced similar setbacks. Falcon 9 achieved its first successful booster landing in 2015, after two failed attempts.

Whether LandSpace follows a comparable path remains uncertain. What is clearer is that the company has already triggered a change in behaviour. Failure is being discussed, not hidden. Design choices are being justified openly. And capital markets are being positioned as part of the solution.

That may prove to be LandSpace’s most lasting contribution—regardless of how its next landing attempt ends.

Want to discover how IoT is transforming telecoms and connectivity? Join the IoT Tech Expo in Amsterdam, California, and London. Explore how innovations in 5G, edge computing, and IoT are shaping the future of networks and services. The event is part of TechEx and co-located with other leading technology conferences, click here for more information.

Telecoms News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.